No diggity. I guess this is what qualifies as “reasonable doubt.” But, as for Kellz, it seems like there was no question it was him. I’m still amazed he was acquitted.
Jurors in the R Kelly. trial explained their not-guilty verdict after acquitting the R&B star of all 14 counts of child pornography on Friday (June 13).
Several members of the jury said they believed it was Kelly on the tape that was at the centre of the trial, however they were unsure of the identity of the female who appeared in the video.
“I thought it was R Kelly. on the tape, I just wasn’t 100 percent on the girl,” said juror #9.
“The key problem was the identity of the female. Her absence was a major lack,” said juror #23.